The Nullification Of Scientology Inc. Management

What follows is a despatch from David Miscavige (supreme leader of Scientology Inc.) to the top marketing ‘executive’ in corporate Scientology, as Miscavige addresses him: Acting, Temporary Marketing Executive International In Training (A/T/MEI I/T).  The adjectives (acting, temporary, in  training) overlap and are duplicative in some sense, but all are combined to nullify the person in question.  The preamble, A-D, serves no purpose other than to further nullify the recipient.


4 MAR 2001



This is so off the wall and so complex compared to what should happen to get it in that I know you:

A) Don’t know org boards, command charts,

B) Your resources,

C) Any tool of management,

D) How Internet works

I’m answering so you don’t take it as okay without any word from me (i.e., COB said nothing, so it must be okay).

Now figure it out—especially since I already went over how it’s done.


The actual order, the last sentence, is the ultimate nullification, and mind game. ‘Figure it out’, is a rather insane direction when Miscavige tells the person that Miscavige already figured out and communicated ‘how it’s done.’

Many who have attempted to work within Miscavige’s zone of influence can attest that this order above is only too typical.  Miscavige issues a dozen, or dozens, of similarly toned nullification orders in any given day.

Compare this to what L. Ron Hubbard writes about the nullification process in Science of Survival:

Nullification actually begins with domination, but becomes very pronounced at about 1.3  (emotional tone of resentment).  A 2.0  (emotional tone of antagonism) might demand of another that he demonstrate enough ‘guts’ to carry forward a project. But from 1.3 down, the modus operandi is any and every effort to convince another human being ‘for his own good’ or ‘for the good of others’ that he has neither the force nor strength to be dangerous.  By rendering the individual undangerous, the 1.3, 1.2 (emotional tone of no-sympathy), 1.1 (emotional tone of covert hostility) and on down seek to dominate him with the pitiful strength which still remains to the 1.3 and down.   The 1.2 and down is most comfortable around sick people, around people who are in apathy, since the 1.1 mistakenly believes these people not to be dangerous because they are obviously weak.  This is so far from good reasoning that the results are catastrophic.

And that explains in a nutshell why there is no international management in Scientology.  There is only a collection of sick, weak, apathetic people who did not have the strength or sense to realize the above before it was too late.  That was evident to me in ’04 when I left,  after this nullification process had been generalized by Miscavige for at least a decade.   After eight more years of it, Miscavige is surrounded by nothing more than shadows.  Their lack of understanding of  (or care for) the world  around them and how it has evolved makes them liabilities as managers. It would take years for any one of them to decompress sufficiently to be effective or trustworthy.  And that would mean a decompression completely unattached to and not influenced by Scientology Inc. culture.  Pining for a replacement of Miscavige is like whistling past one’s own gravesite.

The solution to Scientology Inc and David Miscavige is to move on and create a new Scientology scene.  Scientology Inc has been dead for some time.   As Jesus once said “let the dead bury their own dead” (Matthew 8:22). (for interpretation see this from ‘church of the Great God’).  In this case, I am not suggesting anybody follow anybody, quite the contrary, I am suggesting to folk that they physically and spiritually walk on.

355 responses to “The Nullification Of Scientology Inc. Management

  1. I am newly off-lines and welcome friendship. I am in the Los Angeles area.

    • Welcome, DarnIt!

      Tell your story if you wish. I’d love to hear it.

      • I went to Flag in May and had a horrid trip. If people think Flag is okay now, it is not. Maybe I should just post a copy of my letter to RTC regarding my trip ! At least that way someone would read it …. (PS I so love the Inde’s)

    • Welcome here and thanks for writing to me earlier today. You are among friends. As you feel ready — tell your story. No rush. Take a deep breath first and enjoy your newly earned freedom :)

    • Well DarnIt, welcome to freedom!!
      I am sure you will make lots of new friends.
      I would love to hear your story!
      Seattle, Washington

  2. And what of nullification of people through the second dynamic at the Int base? The ridicule, the “can’t haves”, the sec checking for “thoughts” and punishing thereof?

    Consider the suppression of the Second Dynamic by the Third Dynamic: what does
    the group think about sex? The first group which might come to mind is the family. The
    family’s affinity on the Second Dynamic, when measured by the basic aberration that plagues
    society at the present time, is very low. Sex is not quite nice and certainly not to be considered
    as a communicable subject. Agreement within the family concerning attitude toward sex is
    rare indeed. What is it for? What is it like? When is it proper? Without agreement there can be
    little basis for reality.
    If an individual has been or is a member of a church group which is selectively
    “thumbs down” on sex, he has been suppressed on the Second Dynamic by the Third. The
    auditor is interested in finding how a group affected this individual’s Second Dynamic. He
    seeks to find incidents which enforced the dynamic, and incidents which inhibited it. “What
    did your family think about children?” It is not always necessary that an attack be made
    against an individual for aberration to manifest – the statements and attitudes of the persons
    around the preclear might easily have upset him, even though they were not directly aimed at
    If the preclear has served a term in the army the auditor will have a broad field for
    exploration of aberration along the Second Dynamic. “What did the army think about sex?”
    This one is always productive of results. “Did you ever go on a three-day pass and find an ‘off
    limits’ sign in the choicest section of the city?” There are few occupied cities which do not
    1 This is the next advance over Hurdy-Gurdy Straight Wire, which is outlined in SCIENCE OF SURVIVAL:
    Simplified, Faster, Dianetic Techniques.
    contain a rash of “off limits” signs. “Did you ever attend an army lecture about venereal
    disease?” Of course he did, and if the usual gentle and genteel service communications on
    venereal disease were given, the preclear will have many locks on the subject.
    One case was opened by working with the Second Dynamic as it related to the group
    in this way: A young man had been raised in a very self-righteous family, and attended church
    from earliest childhood. As he grew older a very likeable preacher became the man he most
    wanted to emulate, and one of this preacher’s pet sermons was to call hellfire and damnation
    down upon the head of anyone who would think or talk about sex. When the young man went
    into the army he began to hear and see as a common occurrence those very things which his
    preacher had called down. The general attitude on sex in the army was so radically different
    from what he had been used to that the difference between the inhibition of one group and the
    enforcement of the other made him almost psychotic. The auditor used straight wire on both
    the enforcements and inhibitions on sex, and rapidly raised the young man’s reality and
    general tone.
    Sometimes a girl tells her auditor how nice her dear little pussycats are, but that men
    and women are awfully nasty. She says that if men and women were only as nice and
    considerate as her little pets everything would be all right. Somebody in this girl’s vicinity has
    been talking about how bad people are, and demanding her agreement on the subject. Straight
    wire in search of such locks will soon relegate her pussycat to its rightful place in her life.
    What of the suppressing effect of the First Dynamic on the Second? If an individual
    has been told that he doesn’t love anybody and can’t love anybody, he will have a hard time
    with his affinity for his children. If he has been told that he has to be right all the time and that
    he has to make other people do the right thing, his agreement with his children will come
    chronically down to 1.5 on the tone scale. He will dominate the children, or try to. If he has
    been told that he must talk, his children will have a hard time attracting his attention to their
    ideas. In considering the things in general that the preclear thinks about children and sex, the
    auditor is considering the suppressing effect of the entheta of the Second Dynamic on the
    theta of the Second Dynamic. He can in this way determine that the Second Dynamic is
    suppressing the Second Dynamic. With this in mind, the auditor immediately sees a set of
    questions to ask.


    September, 1951
    The Hubbard Dianetic Foundation, Inc.
    Wichita, Kansas
    From a Lecture by
    L. Ron Hubbard

  3. Hubbard was a creative man who seems to have been determined to recover from the negativity he encountered in the armed forces and while being evaluated by psychiatrists. So he invented his own “science”, which consists of his observations expressed with his own distorted use of language and labeled with numbers. Trying to “save” Scientology by creating an independent movement is likely to simply incur accusations of copyright infringement from Scientology, Inc.

    “Independents” will reach more people if they revert to standard, commonly known words to replace Hubbard’s eccentric vocabulary. Unfortunately, special vocabularies create a separation between the “in group” who know them and the “out” group who don’t. It’s designed to reinforce the idea that Scientologists are a group whose special knowledge sets them apart from others and establishes them as having a unique understanding of human nature.

    This isn’t true of Scientology or of any other religious or “philosophical” group and reinforces a separation between people that contradicts the stated purpose of the “church”.

    No one possesses the “secrets” of human existence because we each have an equal connection to the forces that create and sustain us.

    That knowledge is freely available directly through our everyday life, emotions, dreams, mediation, and intuition as well as through study with people who have achieved certain levels of accomplishment, like Robert Monroe, or William Buhlman, who have mastered how to have out-of-body experiences and who teach it without any memberships or long-term commitments required of the students.

    You can pick up a second-hand book and with a little bit of effort teach yourself how to do this and then proceed to see what spiritual growth results from your own direct experience, uncontrolled by anyone who promotes you to new levels (after you pay a lot of money).

    As an outsider to Scientology and other religions, it seems that there is a nostalgic attachment to the rituals (whether you call them audits, confessions, prayers, hymns, sutras, sermons, etc.) which “leaders” promise will give you mastery over the human condition. The emotional highs and comfort that comes from these rituals can be found in an infinite number of other ways, free from the structure of controlling organizations.

    In addition, many former/independent Scientologists seem to feel a need to redeem and justify the many years of your/their lives that were spent supporting what has evolved into a corrupt, greedy formula for giving people hope and a sense of community while extracting a lot of money and free labor from them.

    Community can be found anywhere that two humans, or simply two living beings, connect with each other, without needing a special vocabulary or structure to make oneself feel like part of a superior group of insiders.

    There are no secrets. You don’t have to go through “levels” of courses to attain insights or some special powers. The truths are within us, each and every one of us, and not just in humans. Everything has an equal connection to the source.

    With regards to Miscavidge, law enforcement and a scrutiny of whether or not he is in compliance with the terms of the nonprofit should be brought to bear on this situation, just like the law has been brought to bear on the Catholic (or any) church that hides abuse of its members, especially children.

    If the independent Scientologists want to make their mark and assert their fundamental difference from the abuses within Scientology in its present form, then someone(s) will have to take responsibility for bringing legal action.

    All of the talk that endlessly enumerates and analyzes Miscavidge’s illegal, abusive and corrupt actions is nothing more than angry lamenting without involving the law. The emotional and factual discussions are necessary for personal healing, but need the scrutiny of the law to really protect against further abuse, exploitation and manipulation.

    Find a team of lawyers who will take this on for free. Many public interest legal groups exist who may be willing to do so. And the apparently deep pockets of Scientology mean that there could be very substantial damages for the church if they lose these lawsuits. This should create some reform or perhaps strip them of their nonprofit status and force a new mission statement that might be closer to the truth – that this is a self-help organization.

  4. Today is a historic day in Scn…10 Aug! Too bad Mc Garbage won’t read any of the PTS data!

    • Hah!! You’re right. It is 10 Aug.

      If Dave won’t read it, and apply it standardly, fug’em, others can, do and will and spot the source and make it vanish.

  5. Going back to earlier and earlier similars, nullification is a suppressive idea which started back as early as 1834, in these united States of America. (I realize in other older countries, it goes way earlier.)

    Dumbing down the intelligence of the masses is real. Ron tried to reverse this trend. I’m amazed how much in PT LRH was regarding this. After LRH, David Miscavige reversed Scientology into dumbing people down. (DM took out 3 study tapes on education which addressed this issue.)

    Here’s a little back history of this nullification in America; (A couple video links are at the end)

    On the night of June 9th, 1834 a group of prominent men “chiefly engaged in commerce” gathered privately in a Boston drawing room to discuss a scheme of universal schooling. Even thought the literacy rate in Massachusetts was 98 percent, and in neighboring Connecticut, 99.8 percent, the assembled businessmen agreed the present system of schooling allowed too much upon chance.

    “It encouraged more entrepreneurial exuberance than the social system could bear.”

    – The Minutes of this meeting are Appleton Papers Collection, Massachusetts Historical Society

    In 1852, the first compulsory schooling laws went into effect in Massachusetts. Eighty percent of the public resisted this new law. “In 1880, it took the militia to persuade the parents of Barnstable, on Cape Cod, to give up their children to the system.”

    – Sheldon Richman, Separating School and State: How to Liberate American Families

    “We want one class of persons to have a liberal education and we want another class of persons, a very much large class of necessity in every society, to forgo the privilege of a liberal education and fit themselves to perform specific difficult manual tasks.”

    – Woodrow Wilson, at the Address to the Federation of High School Teachers

    “The conditioning of modern American society began with John Dewey, a psychologist, a Fabian Socialist and “Father of Progressive Education.” Dewey use the psychology developed by Wilhelm Wundt, and believe that through a stimulus-response approach (like Pavlov) students could be conditioned for a new social order.

    – Charlotte Iserbyt, The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America

    “I believe that education is a regulation of the process of coming to share in the social consciousness; and that adjustment of individual activity on the basis of this social consciousness is the on sure method of social reconstruction.”

    – John Dewey

    “That erroneous assumption is to the effort that the aim of public education is to fill the young of the species with knowledge and awaken their intelligence … Nothing could be further from the truth.

    The aim of public education is not to spread enlightenment to all; it is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality. That is the aim in the United States, whatever the pretensions of polititcians, pedagogues, and other such mountebanks, and that is the aim everywhere else.”

    – H.L. Menchen, The American Mercury, April 1924

    The Dark Intentions of Public Schooling

    Who Controls the Children (Schools Dumb Down Kids Deliberately)

    “Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt was Former Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI) in the US Department of Education under President Reagan. Due to her unique perspective she was able to observe firsthand the methods the Federal Government used to deliberately dumb down the American public education system with Soviet style “brainwashing”.

    Disgusted with the American Government’s policy to use a behavior modification system designed to churn out unthinking, uncritical “citizens of the world” trained to accept socialism, Charlotte set out to wake up her fellow Americans.

    This documentary is a MUST WATCH for any home-schooler, teacher, parent or anyone interested in methods of education or anyone wondering why we as a people seem to grow less intelligent and less able with each passing generation.”

    David Miscavige, why was the “Methods of Education” study tape taken out of the Study Tapes?

    • Is there really much difference between this inculcation done to our kids in public schools and the inculcation done within the Sea Org? (saving the fact that reverse Scientology is faster at inculcation)

      Doesn’t David Miscavige like fresh young blood around him, already pre-inculcated, who are much more easily malleable?

  6. “McGarbage”, I love it!!

  7. Are any celebrity scientologists Indies, or are they Miscavige followers?

  8. I always wonder – does dm writes his own e-mails or someone does it for him?!

  9. Pingback: Miscavige still doesn’t know “how Internet works”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s